SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3406

S.NAGAMUTHU
Bavanandam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Baalasundaram
For the Respondent: C. Mayilvahana Rajendran

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

1. The appellant is the sole accused in Spl. C.C. No. 4 of 2002, on the file of the learned Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai. He stood charged for the offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(2)r/w. 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. By judgment dated 13.06.2007, the trial Court found him guilty under both charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months for the offence under Sections 13(2) r/w. 13(1)(d) of the prevention of Corruption Act. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this Criminal Appeal. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:

The accused at the relevant time, was the Village Administrative Officer of Lakshmi Narasimmapuram village in Pudukkottai District. P.W. 2 Nagaraj, belongs to Pulich



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top