S.VAIDYANATHAN
HDFC Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
S. Vaidyanathan, J.
1. This petition has been filed, seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No. 66 of 2015, pending on the file of the 1st respondent Police.
2. The case of the petitioner is that there was an agreement dated 24.12.2013 between the defacto complainant/2nd respondent and the petitioner, vide which a loan was obtained for a sum of Rs. 9,00,000/- for purchase of a car. Since the 2nd respondent did not repay the loan, after notice to him, the car was seized by the petitioner and kept in their custody. Therefore, the defato complainant has made a complaint against the officials of the Bank and a case was also registered in Crime No. 66 of 2015 for an offence under Section 379 IPC.
2.1. It is submitted that the respondent police also send an undated communication to the petitioner Bank, asking them to surrender the vehicle, as the same is required for investigation as well as for production before the Court. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has approached this Court, seeking to quash the FIR, registered in Crime No. 66 of 2015. Even though notice has been served on the 2nd respondent, no one entered appearance for him.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.