SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3475

S.NAGAMUTHU
V. P. Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
P. Shiek Mideen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : V. Ragavachari.
For the Respondent: A.K. Kumaraswamy.

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 384 of 2004 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Dhara-puram is the appellant herein. The respondent is the sole plaintiff in the suit. The said suit was filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree for specific performance and to direct the defendant to execute a sale deed in respect of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff in terms of the sale agreement dated 13.05.2002 executed bilaterally between the plaintiff and the defendant. The suit was decreed as prayed for by the trial Court by decree and judgment dated 17.10.2006. As against the same, the defendant filed an appeal in A.S. No. 56 of 2007 on the file of the learned Fast Track cum District Munsif, Dharapuram. By decree and judgment dated 24.10.2008, the first appellate Court allowed the appeal and set aside the decree and judgment of the trial Court and dismissed the suit. As against the same, the plaintiff has come up with this second appeal. During the pendency of the second appeal, the appellant has filed M.P. No. 1 of 2015 seeking to amend the prayer in the plaint to include the prayer for alternative relief of refund of advance of sale consideration paid

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top