K. Senthilkumar vs State - 2015 Supreme(Mad) 3468

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3468

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.S.RAVI
K. Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M. Karunanithi
For the Respondents: A. Ramar, Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C. No. 61 of 2012, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli. He stood charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 404 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 15.11.2012, the Trial Court has acquitted the appellant from the charge under Section201 of the Indian Penal Code, but convicted him, as detailed below:--

Convicted under Sections	Sentence imposed	Fine amount
302 IPC	To undergo imprisonment for life.	Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
404 IPC	To under rigorous imprisonment for three years.	Rs. 1, 000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.

The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal.

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:--

"The deceased, in this case, was one Mrs. Soundararani. She was already married to one Mr. Balan. But, the deceased dese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3468

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.S.RAVIK. Senthilkumar – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.S.RAVI
K. Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent