S. Vimala, J.

1. Application No. 2006 of 2012 has been filed by the plaintiffs/Applicants to reopen the evidence on the side of the plaintiffs. Application No. 2007 of 2012 has been filed by the plaintiffs/Applicants to recall the plaintiffs for the purpose of adducing additional evidence. Application No. 2008 of 2012 has been filed by the plaintiffs/Applicants to permit the plaintiffs to file and mark the additional documents. In order to understand the scope of the relief sought for in these three Applications, it is necessary to find out the remedy sought for in the suit.

2. The suit has been filed for a declaration that: a) the suit properties were/are properties held in trust for the benefit of the plaintiffs, by the first defendant, and that he had no right to alienate the same; (b) that defendants 2 to 23 have no right or title or interest on the basis of alienation made by the first defendant; (c) for accounts; (d) for possession and for other alternative relief.

2.1. The first plaintiff wanted to file the following documents, in additional evidence:-

"(i) Plaint in C.S. No. 4538 of 1993 on the file of High Court of Judicature at Bombay;

(ii) Written Statement dated 19.07