SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 371

P.DEVADASS
R. Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Station House Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.J.Rajmohan
For the Respondent:Mr.R.Sreedhar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Pudicherry.

ORDER :

This revision has been directed by the accused as against the concurrent findings recorded by two courts below in C.C.No.118 of 2007. The petitioners were prosecuted for offences under sections 353, 294(b) and 506(i) r/w.34 IPC before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry. They were convicted and sentenced as under :

A1- R.Ramesh

1.

Under section 353 IPC r/w.34 IPC

2 years S.I and fine Rs.1000/- i/d 1 month S.I.

2.

Under section 294(b) IPC r/w.34

3 months S.I and fine Rs.250/- i/d 1 week S.I.

3.

Under Section 506(i) IPC r/w.34 IPC

2 years S.I. and fine Rs.1000/- i/d 1 month S.I.

 

The sentences were directed to run concurrently.

A3 - Mathi @ Madhivanan @ Attukan Madhivanan

1.

Under section 353 IPC r/w.34 IPC

2 years S.I and fine Rs.1000/- i/d 1 month S.I.

2.

Under section 294(b) IPC r/w.34

3 months S.I and fine Rs.250/- i/d 1 week S.I.

3.

Under Section 506(i) IPC r/w.34 IPC

2 years S.I. and fine Rs.1000/- i/d




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top