Back
S.NAGAMUTHU, S.VAIDYANATHAN
Chandiran – Appellant
Versus
State represented by Sub-Inspector of Police – Respondent
(The judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.)
The appellants are the accused Nos. 1 and 3 in S.C. No. 41 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Krishnagiri District. Including the appellants, there were totally four accused in the present case in Cr.No.262 of 2009. The Trial Court framed charges against the accused Nos. 1 to 4 as detailed below:-
| Sl. No. | Charge No. | Rank of Accused | Charged for the Offence |
| 1. | Charge No.1 | Accused No.1 to 3 | U/s. 307 IPC |
| 2. | Charge No.2 | Accused No.4 | U/s.307 r/w.34 IPC |
| 3. | Charge No.3 | Accused No.1 | U/s 324 IPC |
| 4. | Charge No.4 | Accused No.4 | U/s.324 r/w.34 IPC |
| 5. | Charge No.5 | Accused No.3 | U/s.323 IPC (Three Counts) |
| 6. | Charge No.6 | Accused Nos.1, 2 & 4 | U/s.323 r/w.34 IPC (Three Counts) |
| 7. | Charge No.7 | Accused Nos. 1 & 3 | U/s.302 IPC |
| 8. | Charge No.8 | Accused Nos. 2 & 4 | U/s.302 r/w. 34 IPC |
By judgment, dated 27.11.2012, the Trial Court convicted these two appellants alone and acquitted the accused Nos.2 and 4. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
