Chinnadurai vs State by the Inspector of Police

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Mad) 546

S.NAGAMUTHU, S.VAIDYANATHAN
Chinnadurai – Appellant
Versus
State by the Inspector of Police – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan, SC for Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, Mr.D.Veerasekaran, Mr.D.Veerasekaran, Mr.R.Sankarasubbu for Mr.S.Rajanikanth
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

[Judgment of the court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.]

The appellants are the accused 1 to 4 and 7 in SC.No.40/2007 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam. Including the appellants, there were a total number of sixteen accused. They stood charged for the offences u/s.147, 148, 341, 302 and 302 r/w 149 IPC. By judgment dated 12.07.2011, the Trial Court acquitted accused 5, 6, 8, 10 to 16 from all the charges. Accused No.9 [Amirdhalingam] died during pendency of the trial and hence, the charges framed against him automatically abated. The Trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellants for the following offences:-

Sl.No.	Conviction under section	Sentence Awarded
1.	148 IPC	Each of the accused were sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- each, in default, to undergo 3 months simple imprisonment.
2.	341 IPC	Each of the accused to undergo 1 month rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default, to undergo 10 days simple imprisonment
3.	302 r/w 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(Mad) 546

S.NAGAMUTHU, S.VAIDYANATHANChinnadurai – AppellantVersusState by the Inspector of Police – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

S.NAGAMUTHU, S.VAIDYANATHAN
Chinnadurai – Appellant
Versus
State by the Inspector of Police – Respondent