SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 753

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Damodharan – Appellant
Versus
Kantha Bhattad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. G. Justin

ORDER :

These matters stand listed today for admission. The revisions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arise out of a common order dated 06.11.2015 made by the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumpudur in I.A.Nos.1385 and 1386 of 2015 in O.S.No.1393 of 2008 on the file of the said Court for impleading the respondents 1 and 2 as party defendants and to set aside the ex parte decree dated 23.02.2010 respectively.

2. The above said suit came to be filed by one C. Govindaraj and 6 others, who were the sons and daughters of Govindaraj, who is no more, against one D. Sathyadharan (died) and 2) Mrs. Kalpana W/o. Arpudharaj. Though 6 names are found in the first paragraph of the plaint as the plaintiffs, their ranks, namely serial numbers have not been furnished in the plaint. In fact, it is not known whether the plaintiffs 2 to 6 were originally on record as plaintiffs along with the deceased Govindaraj or they got impleaded subsequently as his legal representatives. It is also not known as to what happened to the legal representatives of Sathyadharan, shown as the defendant. Mrs. Kalpana, W/o. Arpudharaj is also shown as a defendant, but the ranks of the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top