P.DEVADASS
S. Kannan – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police – Respondent
This matter arises out of a sent for petition filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C.
2. Though a routine question had been cropped up, but it is put up in a new fashion, question of right of defence, extent of defence, constitutionally guaranteed right of the accused under Article 22(1) had shown.
3. Petitioners/accused are being prosecuted for their alleged commission of certain white collar offences before the learned Special Judge under PC Act/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvellore. Investigation completed. Prosecution package has been produced. Charges were framed. Now, the stage is set for trial of those charges.
4. At this juncture, in the Trial Court, the petitioner filed Crl. M.P. No. 2120 of 2015 under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. seeking production of the following documents for his effective defence:-
1. (a) General diary entries relating to Cr.No.19/2009/HQRS maintained chronologically for the date from 13.06.2009 to 13.5.2010.
(b) Visitors Entry-register maintained at the office of the Vigilance and Anti Corruption, SIC, Chennai – 28 between 01.06.2009 to 17.06.2009.
2. The Chief Engineer, Distribution, Chennai Region South, TNEB, Annasalai, Chennai -2 to cause the production of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.