P.DEVADASS
Zubaida Begum – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Inspector of Police District – Respondent
As these Criminal Revisions are connected on factual matrix, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Crl.R.C.No.357 of 2016 has been directed by A1 as against the dismissal of Crl.M.P.No.406 of 2015 in C.C.No.260 of 2014 (Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu), which has been filed to recall NBW without her personal appearance before the Court.
3. Crl.R.C.No.369 of 2016 is directed as against the dismissal of her Crl.M.P.No.1289 of 2015 in C.C.No.260 of 2014 filed under Section 205 of Cr.P.C. to dispense with her personal attendance in the said Court.
4. A1 is being prosecuted before the said Magistrate's Court for certain offences. Copies under Section 207 Cr.P.C. is to be furnished to her. A1 filed Section 317 Cr.P.C petition to condone her absence on a particular hearing date. It was allowed and the case was posted to a subsequent hearing. On that hearing also, it is stated that the learned counsel for A1 was late in attending the Court. However, by the time NBW was issued against A1.
5. In such circumstances, A1 filed Crl.M.P.No.406 of 2015 to recall the NBW without the personal appearance of A1. Medical Certificate for A1 also has been
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.