SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 828

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Pakkiri – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.R. Gururaj

ORDER :

This matter stands listed today for admission. The submissions made by Mr.R.Gururaj, learned counsel for the petitioner are heard. Certified copy of the impugned order and copies of the other documents produced in the form of typed set of papers are also perused.

2. The plaintiff in O.S.No.159 of 2015 pending on the file of the Court of Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore is the petitioner herein. The defendants are the respondents herein. The petitioner in the revision/plaintiff in the above said suit filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale alleged to have been incorporated in an unregistered sale deed dated 02.06.2015. The said unregistered sale deed was produced along with the plaint as the document, based on which the suit came to be filed. The learned trial Judge found the said document to be not only unregistered, but also insufficiently stamped. Hence the learned trial Judge, after hearing the submissions made on behalf of the plaintiff, passed an order on 29.10.2015, impounded the said document for the collection of the stamp duty to make good the deficiency and ten times of the same as penalty.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner herein




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top