The husband of the petitioner was employed as Office Assistant in the office of the Tahsildar, Sivakasi. He was dismissed from service by order dated 30.04.2008 on certain allegations, after framing charges under rule 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules and after holding enquiry thereto. The petitioner filed appeal to the third respondent, who is the appellate authority.

2. The appeal was rejected by the third respondent by an order dated 27.09.2012. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a review before the second respondent. The same was also dismissed by the second respondent by an order dated 08.12.2014.

3. This writ petition is filed challenging the order of dismissal, the order passed by the appellate authority and the order passed by the reviewing authority.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the right of appeal is a valuable remedy and the appellate authority has not passed a reasoned order in terms of rule 23 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules. He has taken me through the order dated 27.09.2012 of the third respondent.

5. Heard both sides.

6. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for