R.MALA
T. Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
P. C. Ramasamy – Respondent
The petitioner has come forward with the present petition to set aside the impugned order passed in C.M.P. No. 2013 of 2013 dated 03.06.2013 passed by the learned Fast Track Judicial Magistrate No.I, Erode.
2. The petitioner, who is the complainant in S.T.C. No. 233 of 2012 has filed an application to recall P.W.1 and against the dismissal of the same the present petition has been preferred. The petitioner herein filed a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of the cheque issued by the respondent dated 27.12.2007, which was presented in the bank for encashment and returned as insufficient fund and after issuance of statutory notice, the present complaint has been preferred. After both side evidence was over, when the case was posted for arguments, the petitioner herein has filed the application under section 311 Cr.P.C. to recall P.W.1 stating that D.W.1 to D.W.3 were examined to disprove that the petitioner has means to lend such a huge amount. For rebutting the same, recall of P.W.1 just and necessary and that factum was not considered by the trial Court. Hence, to set aside the impugned order passed by the trial Court, the petitioner ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.