M.VENUGOPAL
M. Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
P. Ramalingam – Respondent
M. Venugopal , J.
The Revision Petitioner/Appellant/Accused has filed the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 01.12.2015 in Crl.M.P.No.1305 of 2015 in C.A.No.81 of 2015 passed by the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur.
2. The Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur, on 01.12.2015 in Crl.M.P.No.1305 of 2015 in C.A.No.81 of 2015 had observed the following:
"Heard both sides.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been convicted by the Learned Judicial Magistrate (FTC), Karur on 12.05.2015 in C.C.No.560 of 2013 and the petitioner was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act. According to him, in the absence of the accused, the judgment and order of sentence was passed by the trial Court and immediately, the trial Court issued a NBW to secure the petitioner to serve the period of sentence. He therefore prayed for suspension of the sentence passed by the trial Court till the disposal of the criminal appeal.
The respondent has raised objection for the petition and contended that it is for the petitioner to move the trial Court to get the appropriate relief on su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.