Mr. M. Murugan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.

2. By consent of parties the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal, since the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by earlier decision made by this Court in favour of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner sold the property situated in Survey No.267/1, Rajasuryamadai Village, measuring to an extent of 2.07.5 hectare, 5 acres and 13 cents, to one Paulraj, S/o.Veluchamy, Door No.85, Pulikara Theru, Velipattinam Post, Ramanathapuram District, by way of a sale deed, dated 16.11.2015. When the said sale deed was presented for registration before the second respondent, the same was returned by passing the impugned communication wherein and whereby the second respondent called upon the petitioner to re-present the document for registration with necessary documents supporting the title of the petitioner. In other words through the impugned communication, the second respondent raised a doubt about the title of the petitioner in respect of the property that was conveyed under the above said sale deed.

4. Whether the registering authority has powers to refuse the document presen