Back
2016 Supreme(Mad) 1313
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. VENUGOPAL, J.
Abirami – Petitioner
Vs.
Vallarasi – Respondent
Crl. M.P. No. 3937 of 2016 & Crl. R.C. No. SR12028 of 2016
Decided On : 15-04-2016
Important Points
Subject
Procedural Law - Delay Condonation
Headnote
Delay Condonation - Criminal Revision - The court condoned the delay of 96 days in the subject matter in issue, based on the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Petition.
Fact of the Case:
The court heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Counsel for the Respondent. There was no serious objection on behalf of the Respondent and no counter was filed. The delay of 96 days in the subject matter in issue was condoned, and the Crl.M.P.No.3937 of 2016 in Crl.R.C.Sr.No.2028 of 2016 was allowed.
Finding of the Court:
The court was satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Petition, and therefore, allowed the Crl.M.P.No.3937 of 2016 in Crl.R.C.Sr.No.2028 of 2016.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The delay of 96 days in the subject matter in issue was condoned based on the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Petition.
Final Decision: The Crl.M.P.No.3937 of 2016 in Crl.R.C.Sr.No.2028 of 2016 was allowed.
For the Petitioner: M/s. Karan and Uday.
For the Respondent: Ms. M. Maheswari for Ms. L. Sumathi.
1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Counsel for the Respondent.
2. There is no serious objection on behalf of the Respondent and no counter is filed.
3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Petition, the delay of 96 days in the subject matter in issue is condoned and accordingly, the Crl.M.P.No.3937 of 2016 in Crl.R.C.Sr.No.2028 of 2016 is allowed.
