SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 1635

T.RAJA
A. Thanikachalam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. S. Parthasarathy.
For the Respondent: Mr. J. Harikrishna.

JUDGMENT :

C.M.A.No.3508 of 2008 has been filed by the parents of the deceased-T.Jagan and C.M.A.No.2787 of 2008 has been filed by the wife and two minor children of the deceased-Ekambaram, assailing the impugned orders dated 10.09.2008 & 29.4.2008 passed in O.A.Nos.51 & 121 of 2006 respectively by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench, whereby the claim of the appellants for payment of compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-each with interest at 12% per annum from the date of incident till the date of payment, for the death of T.Jagan and Ekambaram respectively due to the accidental fall from the moving trains on the respective dates was rejected by the Tribunal.

2. The facts in brief leading to the filing of the C.M.A.No.3508 of 2008 are as follows. The parents of the deceased-T.Jagan filed O.A.No.51 of 2006 before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench seeking for compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-on the ground that their son, aged about 20 years, left the house on the morning of 10.4.2006 at about 7.00 AM by saying that he was going to attend the Ramakrishna Matriculation Higher Secondary School, West Mambalam to write the monthly test after purchasing a monthly season ticket for his t

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top