SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 1668

M.JAICHANDREN, S.NAGAMUTHU
M. Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Navaneethakrishnan, R. Nalliyappan
For the Respondent: M. Maharaja

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C. No. 146 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Erode at Erode District. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302, 364 and 201 IPC. By judgment dated 17.08.2012, the trial Court convicted him under all the charges. For the offence under Section 302 IPC, the trial Court sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three years and for the offence under Section 364 IPC, sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three years and for the offence under Section 201 IPC, sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/- in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. The above sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:

1.1. The deceased in this case was one Annakili @ Annalakshmi. P.Ws. 2 and 3 are the father and mothe
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top