SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 1686

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, T.MATHIVANAN
Special Tahsildar, (Land Acquisition) – Appellant
Versus
M. Ponnusamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Gunasekaran, AGP.
For the Respondent: G. Rajan.

JUDGMENT :

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

1. This appeal filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arises out of an award passed by the Land Acquisition Tribunal, enhancing the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. We have heard Mr. P. Gunasekaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (Appeals) and Mr. G. Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

2. In order to widen and strengthen the existing State Highways Roads and for forming new bypass roads in the important towns in Tamil Nadu, the Government issued G.O. Ms. No. 174, Highways dated 25.9.2001 authorising the District Collectors to acquire lands through private negotiations. In Tiruvannamalai District, about 47 villages located in 4 taluks were chosen for widening of roads and 18 villages in 3 taluks were chosen for forming new bypass.

3. In Tiruvannamalai Taluk itself, the lands located in 8 villages were chosen for acquisition for the purpose of forming bypass. One such village was Nochimalai village. In the said village, the lands chosen for acquisition were located in 24 sub-d
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top