SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 1862

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.BHARATHIDASAN
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State : Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Manali New Town – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.V.Parthiban
For Respondent: Mr.M.Maharaja, Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGEMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

The appellant is A.1 in S.C.No.68 of 2012 on the file of the learned Mahalir Judge (Mahalir Fast Track Court), Tiruvallur. There were three other accused in this case. The trial court framed four charges against the accused as detailed below:-

Sl.No

Accused

Section of law

1

A.1

341, 323 & 302 I.P.C.

2

A.2

341, 323 & 302 r/w 34 I.P.C.

3

A.3

341, 323 & 302 r/w 34 I.P.C.

4

A.4

341, 323 & 302 r/w 34 I.P.C.

By judgment dated 16.09.2014, the trial Court convicted A.1 for offences under sections 341 & 302 I.P.C., and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two weeks for offence under Section 341 I.P.C., and to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. The trial Court found A.2 to A.4 guilty for offence under Section 341 I.P.C., and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for two weeks. The trial Court acquitted the accused from the other charges. Challenging the said conviction and sen






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top