P.N.PRAKASH
T. Kannan – Appellant
Versus
Piramal Diagnostics Services Private Limited – Respondent
For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as Piramal Diagnostics and Kannan.
2. While Crl.O.P. No.9414 of 2016 is filed seeking to call for the records and set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P. No.660/2016 in C.C. No.373/2012 passed by the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, Crl.O.P. No.23056 of 2012 is filed to call for the records relating to C.C. No.373 of 2012 on the file of the V Metropolitan Magistrate Court and quash the same.
3. Kannan was the Sole Proprietor of a Diagnotics Centre by name Isotope Diagnostics in Chennai, which, Piramal Diagnostics, wanted to acquire and so, they entered into an agreement of purchase dated 01.06.2007, under which, Kannan agreed to sell Isotope Diagnostics for a total sale consideration of Rs.4.20 crores out of which Rs.2.52 crores was paid by Piramal Diagnostics to Kannan on 01.06.2007 under the said agreement and the balance amount of Rs.1.68 crores is due to Kannan. Contemporaneously, Piramal Diagnostics and Kannan entered into a consultancy agreement dated 01.06.2007 under which Kannan was appointed as Consultant for Piramal Diagnostics on payment of Rs.12 lakhs per annum and other perks. Thereafter, on 06
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.