SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 1791

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.DEVADASS, J.
A.Krishnan - Petitioner
Vs.
The Superintendent of Police - Respondents
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10029 of 2016
Decided On : 24-06-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Venkatesh
For the Respondent: Mr.P.Kandasamy

The power to direct registration of F.I.R. should be exercised cautiously, based on credible information disclosing a cognizable offence, and not on mere suspicion.

Headnote:

Section 482 Cr.P.C - Registration of F.I.R. - Misuse of Power - The court declined to issue a direction to the Vigilance and Anti-corruption Police to register an F.I.R. against the V.A.O. based on the petitioner's allegations of corruption, as it was deemed a misuse of power and there was no element of cognizable offence except for suspicion of receiving money.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a direction to the Vigilance and Anti-corruption Police to register a criminal case against the V.A.O., alleging corruption and improper performance of duty.

Finding of the Court:

The court declined to issue the direction, stating that the petitioner's allegations did not disclose a cognizable offence and that setting the Prevention of Corruption Act in motion based on mere suspicion was not correct.

Issues: Misuse of power, Allegations of corruption, Improper performance of duty, Cognizable offence

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the power to direct registration of F.I.R. should not be exercised lightly and that serious consequences are involved. It highlighted the need for credible information and cautioned against putting personal liberty at stake based on mere suspicion.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, with the court advising the petitioner to pursue other remedies through the appropriate authorities if strong material was available.

ORDER :

In this Crl.O.P., under Section 482 Cr.P.C, Krishnan, the petitioner herein, came forward to direct the 2nd respondent, namely, DSP, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar District at Virudhunagar to register a criminal case as against Malarvizhi, V.A.O., Rajapalayam Town, investigate and proceed further as per law.

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the said woman V.A.O is a corrupt lady. She acted with corrupt motive. As she is a corrupt woman she has to be corrected by taking action under the prevention of Corruption Act.

3. Almost the power exercised by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is akin to the power exercised by a learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. The difference is one being exercised by this Court and the other being exercised by the Magistrate. In sum and substance, the effect is one and same. The Magistrate forward the complaint to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and this Court directs the police to register a case under Section 482 Cr.P.C. In both the matters, the averments must disclose a cognizable offence. It must be based on a credible information.

4. By mere drop of a hat ordering for registration of F.I.R. or forwarding the complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for investigation should not be done. By a two lines order the Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. or a few lines order of this Court under 482 Cr.P.C. cannot put the personal liberty of a person at stake.

5. Registration of F.I.R. is not a pleasurable one. Nobody likes to be an accused. Nobody will have a pride in being called an accused. Of course there are certain exceptions. But they are very rare cases.

6. Registration of F.I.R. leads to many unpleasant evil consequences. One will have the title of accused. No one boost himself that he has become an accused. Seriousness is involved in issuing direction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., so also by forwarding a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

7. A reading of the complaint must disclose that there is something, which may be inquired into or probed. Court cannot and should not do it mechanically. No registration of F.I.R. by the mere asking.

8. Now, in this case, from a reading of the averments it is clear that an eternal property dispute is going on between the petitioner and one Murugesan and a case is also pending in a civil Court. Malarvizhi, V.A.O., Rajapalayam issued a certificate to Murugesan.

9. According to the petitioner, she issued the certificate based on incorrect information. According to him, it is improper performance of duty. But in order to bring a person as accused under Prevention of Corruption Act he says that he might have received money. If these single lines are acted upon, then most of the people will become accused. As already stated, registration of F.I.R. leads to very serious consequences. The career of a woman will be affected. Taking averments as such, the petitioner may approach the District Collector. If the Collector has not taken any action he can file petition to next superior officer. In this matter setting the Prevention of Corruption Act in motion is not correct. It is misuse of power of the Court. There is no element of cognizable offence except some allegation that he is suspecting that the V.A.O. could have received some money.

10.In the light of the above, it is not a fit case under section 482 Cr.P.C. to issue a direction to the Vigilance and Anti corruption Police to register an F.I.R. and trouble that V.A.O.

11.In view of the foregoings we decline to issue direction as sought for. Thus, this petition fails and it is dismissed. However, it is always open to the petitioner, if he is so advised and if he has strong material, to pursue any other remedy as against the said public servant, namely, Malarvizhi, V.A.O., Rajapalayam before her superior authorities and her higher authorities should not act mechanically and they should take utmost care and caution in taking further action as per law.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top