SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 1794

G.CHOCKALINGAM
A. Suresh Anto – Appellant
Versus
Anto Teena Mary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.M.Rajavelu
For the Respondent: Mr.M.Baskaran

ORDER :

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner praying to allow this criminal revision by setting aside the order dated 27.08.2015 passed by the learned XVI Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, in C.A.No.169 of 2012 and direct the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, to take up M.P.No.114 of 2012 for enquiry in C.C.No.1854 of 2012.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

(i) The respondent as a complainant filed a petition in M.P.No.59 of 2012 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking interim relief of Residence Order and monetary Reliefs per month under Section 23(3) of the Act. The learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, after hearing the petitioner and after perusing the petition, has passed an order on 14.05.2012 which reads as follows:-

"1. The respondents 2 to 4 stay away from the petitioner to prohibit violence against her.

2. The respondents are ordered not to disturb the petitioner from the Shared house at 268/11, Udhayam Colony, Anna Nagar





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top