SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 1785

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.BHARATHIDASAN
Suresh (a) Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State, by Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. A. Arasu Ganesan, Mr. C.M. Gunasekaran
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Maharaja, Mr. C.K.M. Appaji

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

The appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 296 of 2013 are the accused 2 and 3 in S.C. No. 124 of 2012 on the file of I Additional Sessions Court, Cuddalore. By judgment, dated 06.04.2013, the trial Court convicted these two appellants/accused 2 and 3 for the offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each; in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, they have come up with Criminal Appeal No. 296 of 2013.

2. In the above case, including the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.296 of 2013, there were totally six accused. The trial Court framed as many as six charges against all the six accused, as detailed below :

Sl. No.

Accused

Section of law

1

A.1

294 (B), 148, 307 & 302 r/w 149 IPC

2

A.2

294 (B), 148, 302 & 307 r/w 149 IPC

3

A.3

294 (B), 148, 302 & 307 r/w 149 IPC

4

A.4

294 (B), 148, 302 & 307 r/w 149 IPC

5

A.5

294 (B), 148, 307 & 302 r/w 149 IPC

6

A.6

294 (B






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top