SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3666

K.K.SASIDHARAN
Ramasamy Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Dineswaran – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : P. Valliappan
For the Respondent: K. Ramasamy

ORDER :

K.K. Sasidharan, J.

1. The order passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruchengode, allowing the application filed by the plaintiff to amend the plaint is challenged in this Civil Revision Petition at the instance of the defendants, primarily on the ground that similar application filed earlier was dismissed as not pressed and as such, a fresh application is barred by the principles of res judicata.

Facts in nutshell:-

2. The guardian of the respondent filed a civil suit in O.S. No. 123 of 2008, before the Principal District Munsif, Tiruchengode, praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the petitioners herein from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. The suit was contested by the petitioners by filing written statement. The application filed by the respondent through guardian to amend the plaint was dismissed as withdrawn. Thereafter, on attaining majority, the respondent filed a fresh application in I.A. No. 1111/2013, praying for an order to amend the plaint for the grant of a decree of declaration. The application was contested by the petitioners.

3. The learned Trial Judge opined that the guardian should have file











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top