R.MAHADEVAN
Virudhunagar District Bus Owners Association – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
R. Mahadevan, J.
1. These writ petitions have been filed seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent made under G.O.Ms. No. 29, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MC II) Department, dated 31.01.2011, and quash the same and direct the second respondent to refund the amount collected from the members of the petitioner Association from 01.12.2005 till date and further forbear the second respondent from collecting any toll fee for using the mechanically propelled vehicle for using inner ring road in Madurai city by the members of the petitioner Association. Since the issue involved in these writ petitions is similar, both the writ petitions are taken up together for hearing and disposed of, by this common order.
2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of these writ petitions, are as follows:
2.1. The members of the petitioner Associations are the stage carriage operators operating either within Virudhunagar District or on inter-district route between Madurai District and Virudhunagar District. The Government had established an Integrated Bus Stand at Mattuthavani, Madurai, and an inner ring road had been formed on the northern
Divisional Controller, KSRTC Vs. Mahadeva Shetty
Girnar Traders Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mamleshwar Prasad v. Kanhaiya Lal
Mangal Prasad Tamoli v. Narvadeshwar Mishra [(2005) 3 SCC 422]
State of Haryana Vs. Ranbir alias Rana, 2006 (3) CTC 48 (SC)
Tvl. N.V.S. Agro Derivatives v. The Commercial Tax Officer (Circle I)
Upen Chandra Gogoi v. State of Assam [(1998) 3 SCC 381]
Virudhunagar District Bus Owners Association v. Government of Tamil Nadu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.