M.VENUGOPAL
A. Villava Rayan – Appellant
Versus
State Human Rights Commission – Respondent
1. Heard both sides.
2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents.
4. According to the petitioner, the first respondent/State Human Rights Commission in SHRC Case No.7598 of 2014, on 02.12.2014, had directed the second respondent/District Collector, Tirunelveli, to enquire into the matter and take necessary action. The grievance of the petitioner is that his original RC book was kept in Bank and he approached the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi with attested copy of RC Book, Notary's letter along with Rs.15,000/-. But the Revenue Divisional Officer rejected his request and refused to release the vehicle without original RC Book, even though the attested RC Book was produced before him. Further, the petitioner approached the Bank for getting the original RC Book and the Bank had also instructed him that original RC Book would be handed over to him only on payment of remaining loan amount. Since he is an agriculturist, he could not pay the remaining loan amount immediately, therefore, he is not in a position to recover his tractor from the Revenue Divisional Officer. His tractor is rema
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.