M.VENUGOPAL
P. Krishnamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department – Respondent
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners; the Learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 and the Learned Counsel for the Third Respondent.
2. The Petitioners have preferred the present writ petitions seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned orders in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-1; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No. 2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/Aa1-2; Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/ Aa1-2 respectively, as well as the consequential order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2578/2016/ Aa1-3 passed by the Second Respondent, dated 20.06.2016 and to quash the same.
3. The Factual Matrix of the Writ Petitions:-
3.1. According to the Petitioners, they were Hereditary Trustees of Arulmigu Vigneshwarar Vagaiyara Temple, Old Ayakudi, Palani and three sub-temples viz., Arulmigu Idumban Temple, Sivagiripatti, Palani, Utchimakaliamman Kovil and Muthupetchi @ Kaliamman Kovil as well as the present Chairman of Trust Board of Arulmigu Vigneshwarar Vagaiyara Temple. The aforesaid Temples were originally built by their forefathers and they were in complete administration and management of the affairs of the temple. As a matter of fact, a scheme was also settled in O.A. No. 1
S.V. RAMASWAMY POOSARI v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS
S. SANKARALINGAM POOSARI AND OTHERS v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
SRI AUDIKESAVA PERUMAL PEYALWAR DEVASTHANAM, MYLAPORE & OTHERS v. THE COMMISSIONER
M.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. v. JAHAN KHAN reported in 2007 (10) SCC 88
Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks [(1998) 8 SCC 1]
Harbanslal Sahnia & Anr. Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. [(2003) 2 SCC 107] & Ors.
State of H.P. Vs. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. [(2005) 6 SCC 499]
Sanjana M. Wig Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. [(2005) 8 SCC 242])
LILY THOMAS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERES reported in 2013 (7) SCC 653
R.VENKATA RANGAREDDY v. N. MURALIDHAR RAO reported in AIR 1983 AP 83
JAIPUR ZILA SAHAKARI BHOOMI VIKAS BANK LTD. v. RAM GOPAL SHARMA reported in 2002 (2) SCC 244
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.