P.DEVADASS
Samuel Jebakani – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent
Samuel Jebakani, the de facto complainant dissatisfied with the decision of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Thoothukudi, dismissing his petition in Cr.M.P.No.90 of 2016 filed in S.C.No.232 of 2015, under Section 173 Cr.P.C., seeking re-investigation.
2. Based on the complaint of the said Samuel Jebakani, the Thoothukudi North Police, registered a case in Crime No. 444 of 2011, for 'Girl Missing'. The Investigation Officer conducted the investigation, concluded it and filed the final report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., before the learned Judicial Magistrate No. II, Thoothukudi, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 I.P.C. The learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance thereon in P.R.C. No. 1 of 2013. Thereafter, the learned Judicial Magistrate supplied the copies of documents to the accused. The learned Judicial Magistrate, having found certain offences are exclusively triable by a Court of Sessions, committed the case to the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, under Section 209 Cr.P.C. The learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, made over the case to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Thoothu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.