M.VENUGOPAL
Lakshmirajan – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent
Heard both sides.
2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents.
4. According to the Petitioner, he is the owner of the Tractor and Trailer bearing Registration Nos. TN 76 S 3562 and TN 76 S 3561. He has purchased the vehicle in the year 2012. He bought the permit from the Regional Transport Authority and the vehicle has been used for commercial purpose. When that be the factual situation, on 15.7.2016 the Petitioner used his vehicle to take the clay sand, which is used for manufacturing bricks by getting necessary permission from one Gurunathan at Sivagiri. In fact, he obtained permit and the time was given from 12.35 p.m. To 3.35 p.m. on 15.7.2016. In fact, the Petitioner's driver Manikandan unloaded the sand to the bricks manufacturing place. Further, the Petitioner obtained permit for the same purpose and transported the clay sand from the very same permit issuing authority with the necessary permit. However, the Second Respondent had intercepted the vehicle within the permit time and seized the vehicle and also the permit. Immediately, his driver had informed the Petitioner tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.