SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2089

M.M.SUNDRESH
Banana Brand Works Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kavan Antani, Director, Bananabandy Network Private Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. The applicant/plaintiff - M/s Banana Brand Private Limited is a private limited company (registered) engaged in the business of Advertising, Building Brand Strategies, Brand Identity, Digital Marketing, Social Media Marketing, Web Branding, Creative Design, Retail Design, Environmental Graphic Design, Photography, Video Production and other allied services.

2. The applicant has adopted a fanciful and arbitrary mark “BANANA”. At the time of its adoption, there was no other mark in the field of operation of the applicant. This mark is used in the service, which has got no connection with banana fruit. Thus, there is no direct or remote connection to the nature of quality of goods. It has registered its logo “BANANA” as a series mark under Classes 35 and 42. The said exercise has been done through multiple applications under Section 15(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. It started using “BANANA” and its logo from the year 2007 onwards. For such service rendered, it bagged various awards and accolades. It acquires permanent clients, such as, Hyatt, Michelin, VBJ, TVS, Sun TV, Daimler, Pricol, Medimix, Chaitanya, Amrutanjan, etc. It also maintains websites to cater to the need



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top