K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
P. Jayarama Pillai – Appellant
Versus
K. Balakrishnan – Respondent
S.A. No. 885 of 2009 is filed by the second defendant in a suit for declaration of plaintiff's title to the suit properties and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit properties.
2. S.A. No. 886 of 2009 is filed by the fourth defendant in a suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendants 1 to 3 to shift the service connection No.78 of Seethamangalam village from the suit property.
3. The appellant in both the appeals is one and the same. It is submitted by the learned counsels appearing on either side that the decision to be made in S.A. No. 885 of 2009 will automatically have a bearing on the other appeal S.A. No. 886 of 2009.
S.A. No. 885/2009:-
4. S.A. No. 885 of 2009 arises out of suit in O.S. No. 113 of 1993 filed on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madhurantakam. The first respondent herein as the plaintiff filed the said suit for declaration and permanent injunction as stated supra.
5. The case of the plaintiff in the said suit is as follows:
The suit properties were allotted to the share of the plaintiff in pursuant to a family partition took place on 19.09.1992
R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder vs. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.