SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2809

P.N.PRAKASH
V. Sivasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Nirmala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: S.T. Varadarajulu
For the Respondents: K. Venkatramani, V. Jayaparkash Narayanan

JUDGMENT :

1. These contempt petitions are filed on the ground that the order dated 24.01.2011 passed by this Court in W.P. Nos. 34640 of 2007 and 24409 of 2008 respectively, has not been complied with by the respondents.

2. The petitioners were employees of Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation, which is a creature of the Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 (Central Act 58 of 1962). The petitioners made a request to the Managing Director of the Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation to constitute a Pension Scheme for them and in deference to their request, the Managing Director of the Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation sent a proposal dated 27.02.2001 to the Government for introducing Pension Scheme to the employees and officers of the Tamil Nadu Warehousing Corporation as applicable to the employees of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, etc. The Government, by letter dated 16.07.2001, negatived the proposal on the ground that it would be an additional financial burden on the State exchequer. Challenging the said order passed by the Government and also seeking a mandamus to the Government to prepare a Pension Scheme, the petitioners filed W.P. Nos. 34640 of 2007
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top