M.DURAISWAMY
Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Salem – Appellant
Versus
Padmasini Ammal – Respondent
Challenging the Order passed in R.E.A No.58/2013 in REP No.128/2009 in LAOP No.82/1978 on the file of I Additional Sub Court, Salem, the Judgment Debtor has filed the Civil Revision Petition in CRP No.2186 of 2016.
The Civil Revision Petition No.2187 of 2015 arises against the order passed in R.E.A.No.60/2013ub REO Bi.129/2009 in LAOP No.83/1978 on the file of I Additional Sub Court, Salem, the Judgment Debtor has filed the above Civil Revision Petition.
2. Pursuant to the decree passed in LAOP Nos.83/1978 and 82/1978, the claimants filed Execution Petitions in R.E.P No.128 and 129 of 2009 for realising the amount.
3. The Judgment Debtor filed his counter and was contesting the Execution Petition. In the said Execution Petition, the revision petitioner/judgment debtor filed an application in R.E.A.Nos.58/13 and 60/13 to stay all further proceedings in the execution petition. In the affidavit, filed in support of the petition, the judgment debtor has stated that the amount, claimed by the claimants/ the Decree Holders is very excessive and therefore, without filing a calculation memo, appropriate orders cannot be passed by the Executing Court. In these circumstances, the Judgmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.