SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2446

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. VENUGOPAL, J.
K.Anitha - Petitioner
Vs
The Branch Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.12503 of 2016
Decided on : 03-08-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. R.Karunanidhi
For the Respondent: Mr. A.Thiyagarajan

The court emphasized the importance of education as a national wealth and highlighted the constitutional provisions under Article 46 and Article 41, which promote the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the society and secure the right to work and education for the needy and deserving.

Headnote:

Educational Loan - Right to Education - Oriental Education Loan Scheme - 1. Master Circular: Oriental Education Loan Scheme HO:Retail:63:2014-15:1029 dated 31.3.2015 2. Oriental Education Loan Scheme. Clarification for Appraisal/sanction/disbursement branches for Category A & B Institutions HO:Retail:09:2015-16:121 dated 13.5.2015 3. Oriental Education Loan Scheme-Modification in Primary Security/Co-Obligation terms in 'A' Category institutions HO:Retail:11:2015-16:222 dated .17.6.2015 4. Oriental Education Loan Scheme-Modification in scheme HO:Retail:13:2015-16:252 dated 29.6.2015 5. Education Loan -Classification of IIT Patna in Category A institutes HO:Retail:26:2015-16:378 dated 17.08.2015 6. Oriental Education Loan Scheme Modification in Scheme HO:Retail:55:2015-16:820 dated 19.1.2016 - The court discussed the Oriental Education Loan Scheme and its various circulars, eligibility criteria, courses eligible, margin, security, rate of interest, and repayment guidelines. The court emphasized the importance of education as a national wealth and highlighted the constitutional provisions under Article 46 and Article 41, which promote the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the society and secure the right to work and education for the needy and deserving. The court directed the petitioner to submit her educational loan application in proper format before the Respondent/Bank and instructed the bank to consider the loan application sympathetically and pass necessary orders within two weeks.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner completed her education and secured admission to Bachelor of Engineering(Electrical and Electronics Engineering) at K.L.N.College of Information and Technology, Madurai. She applied for an educational loan with the Respondent/Bank, but the bank refused to process the application. The petitioner's family faced economic crisis and had to pledge gold ornaments to pay the first year college fee and transport fee. The petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking relief.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to submit her educational loan application in proper format before the Respondent/Bank and instructed the bank to consider the loan application sympathetically and pass necessary orders within two weeks.

Issues: The main issue was the refusal of the Respondent/Bank to process the petitioner's educational loan application despite her genuine need and the economic crisis faced by her family.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of education as a national wealth and highlighted the constitutional provisions under Article 46 and Article 41, which promote the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the society and secure the right to work and education for the needy and deserving. The court directed the petitioner to submit her educational loan application in proper format before the Respondent/Bank and instructed the bank to consider the loan application sympathetically and pass necessary orders within two weeks.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the court's directions to the petitioner and the Respondent/Bank.

ORDER :

Heard both sides.

2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents.

4. According to the Petitioner, she had completed S.S.L.C at TVS Higher Secondary School, Madurai and scored 480 marks. Subsequently, she had completed +2 examination in the year March 2014 and she secured 1058 marks. She also attended the counselling and secured admission to Bachelor of Engineering(Electrical and Electronics Engineering) during the year 2014 at K.L.N.College of Information and Technology, Madurai. The said college is recognized by the Anna University, Chennai.

5. The grievance of the Petitioner is that her family is facing economic crisis and she applied for educational loan with the Respondent/Bank. In fact, the Respondent/Bank directed her parents to open a new account for pursuing the educational loan at their end. In reality, her father opened a new account on 11.11.2014 and the Account No. is 06122191014612. Likewise, her mother also opened a new account and the Account No. is 06122191014605. Later, the Respondent/Bank received her application and assured to provide educational loan amount of Rs.4 lakhs.

6. The real grievance of the Petitioner is that after receiving the application, the Respondent/Bank refused to process the application for sanctioning the loan amount. In the meanwhile, her parents pledged their gold ornaments and obtained loan with exorbitant interest and paid the first year college fee and transport fee for her studies. Thereafter, she sent a representation on 16.09.2015 to the Respondent/Bank and requested to sanction the educational loan amount for pursuing education at Engineering College. Thereafter, on 1.7.2016, she and her parents requested in person for educational loan of Rs.2 lakhs for completing the remaining two years. Subsequently on 4.7.2016 she sent a representation, which was acknowledged by the Respondent/Bank on 5.7.2016. Further, the Respondent/Bank had not considered her representations.

7. At this stage, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Government has to provide assistance financially to promote poor students and Right to Education is one of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India. Inasmuch as the representations of the Petitioner have not met with any positive response in the hands of the Respondent/Bank, the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the relief as stated supra.

8. At this stage, the Learned Counsel for the Respondent/Bank brings it to the notice of this Court that on 26.05.2015, a message was sent to all Bank Branches in Madurai City on the subject of Educational Loans whereby and where-under it is mentioned as follows:

There is no service area concept for education loans as per RBI guidelines. However, in the earlier years for easy approach of students/parents, as per the decision taken in the Bankers Meeting (DLRC), wards were allocated to each Bank Branch.

Now in Madurai City there are 100 wards with around 217 Bank Branches. Many wards have more than one Bank Branches. Many Banks have shifted their Branches in main locality even though the Branch license is for different area. In the past year our office received more complaints through District Collectorate. CM Cell and also directly from parents regarding non sanction of/delay in sanctioning education loans. Few parents gone to Ombudsman, RBI and few filed Writ Petition in High Court -Madurai Bench. We also observed from the quarterly reports submitted by Bankers that some of the Bankers did not consider education loan during last year.

As the admission process to colleges has been started, in the DCC Meeting the matter has been discussed and following decision have been made:

1. All Banks other than specialised branches like SME Branch in the ward (Private/Nationalized) should











































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top