PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
M. Sivalingam – Appellant
Versus
Rajini Mahalingam – Respondent
1. The suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for the following reliefs:
(a) to declare that the plaintiff is the sole and absolute owner of the suit property at Flat No.G-3, No.43, Old No.18 and 19, 1st Avenue, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020, more fully described in the Schedule and for a consequential direction to the defendants to vacate and hand over vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff.
(b) to pay a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- towards damages for use and occupation of the premises for the period from June 2004 to March 2007.
(c) to pay a sum of Rs.40,000/- towards damages for use and occupation of the premises for two months i.e., April and May 2007.
(d) to pay Rs.20,000/- per month towards future damages at the rate of from 01.06.2007, till the date of decree and thereafter also at the same rate till the date of the defendants vacating and handing over the suit property to the plaintiff.
(e) to grant such other reliefs.
2. The averments made by the plaintiff in the plaint are as follows:
(a) The plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit property. The first defendant is the wife of the plaintiff's brother-in-law and the second defendant is the so
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.