SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2306

B.GOKULDAS
Sarasu – Appellant
Versus
Ravi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V. Sribalaji, Mrs. J. Maria Roseline
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Singaravelan, M/s. J. Nishabanu

ORDER :

Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order, dated 21.07.2005, made in I.A. No. 649 of 2004 in O.S. No. 852 of 2000 on the file of II-Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli.

2. The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit in O.S. No. 852 of 2000 against the petitioner/defendant for specific performance before the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

3. The case of the respondent/plaintiff is that she entered in to an agreement with the petitioner/defendant on 09.03.2000, whereby and whereunder, the petitioner/defendant agreed to sell his property for a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- and the respondent/plaintiff paid an advance of Rs.95,000/- on the said date and the balance sale consideration should be paid within a period of seven months. On receipt of such balance sale consideration, the petitioner/defendant should execute sale deed in favour of the plaintiff. Though the respondent/plaintiff was ready and willing to pay the balance sale consideration, the petitioner/defendant did not come forward to comply with the terms of the agreement entered into on 09.03.2000. Hence, the respondent/plaintiff filed the above suit.

4. The Trial Court decreed the suit exparte on 09.02.2













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top