The de facto complainant in a criminal case aggrieved by certain portion of the conditions imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. VI, Madurai in ordering the return of property/vehicle in Crl. M.P. No. 2746 of 2016 has directed this revision.

2. Heard both sides. Perused the impugned order and the materials on record.

3. The revision petitioner is the de facto complainant. It is stated already that he has suffered by the criminal act committed by the accused persons, now by certain onerous conditions imposed upon him by the Court, he has to suffer still further.

4. The de facto complainant is the owner cum driver of the TATA India Car TN 58 AL 1191. He used to wait for passengers near Mattuthavani bus stand in Madurai. The accused have booked the car at Madurai for going to Sholavandan. The de facto complainant was happy. But it was short lived. Near Kochadai, his passengers have become robberers. They have stabbed him and left him in lurch and took the car with them.

5. Based on the complaint of the car driver, Nagamalai Pudukkottai Police has registered a case in Crime No. 293 of 2016 under Sections 394 and 397 IPC. In the course of investigation, the said car has been