SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2071

G.CHOCKALINGAM
V. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
A. Ravikumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.P. Saravanan
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Jayaprakash

ORDER :

The criminal revision petition is directed against the order passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur in CA. No. 25 of 2014 dated 17.03.2016 confirming the sentence dated 30.04.2014 made in STC. No. 118 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Hosur.

2. The facts relating to the criminal revision is briefly as follows :-

The respondent complainant preferred a private complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable instruments Act for the cheque issued by the revision petitioner in favour of the respondent for Rs. 2,55,000/- on 12.02.2013, when the cheque was presented for collection on 06.03.2013, the same was returned by the Banker on the same day with an endorsement “account closed”. The complainant immediately issued notice dated 18.03.2013 to the accused. The accused after receipt of the notice did not replied for the said notice and not paid the cheque amount. Therefore, the petitioner presented the private complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, FTC, Hosur. The learned trial judge after perusing the evidence adduced on both sides and entire documents awarded punishment of six months simple imprisonment and directed to pay













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top