SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2018

V.M.VELUMANI
Karuppaiah – Appellant
Versus
P. R. Rajesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.Andiraj.
For the Respondent Mr. K.Rajeshwaran, Mr. P.Kannithevan, Government Advocate.

ORDER :

This petition has been filed praying to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the first respondent vide order dated 13.05.2015 made in Crl.M.P.No.1068 of 2015 by the learned Vacation Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

2. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner and first respondent are neighbours. The first respondent introduced one Muthukumar (A.1) as Satheshkumar and he is the owner of the land to an extent of 2 acres situated at Tamalaroobam Village in Trichy within the Corporation limit and A.1 informed him that he is going to sell the said property. Believing the same, the petitioner paid a sum of Rs.2 crores to the first respondent and A.1 as advance. After receiving the amount, both the accused have evaded to register the document in favour of the petitioner and cheated him. On verification, the petitioner came to know that the accused colluded together and with the help of other persons created forged documents as if A.1 is the original owner. The petitioner lodged a complaint before the Inspector of Police, Woraiyur Police Station against A.1 and the first respondent. Both of them have filed Crl.O.P(MD) Nos.22569 and 22671 of 2014 before this Court





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top