SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2928

G.CHOCKALINGAM
Hemamalini – Appellant
Versus
C. M. Suresh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. Margabandhu
For the Respondent: Mr. E. Kannadasan

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vellore made in MC.No.4 of 2008 dated 06.07.2009, dismissing the maintenance application filed by the revision petitioner.

2. It is admitted by both sides that the revision petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent. The said marriage was held on 24.01.1999 at Sri Ragavendra Kalyana Mandapam, Vellore according to Hindu rites and customs. Since, the marriage is admitted, the respondent/husband is liable to maintain her wife. The wife filed divorce petition, the same was dismissed, after dismissal of the divorce petition, the present maintenance petition was filed, the trial Court ought to have noted the dowry harassment and divorce, are the sufficient cause for claiming maintenance, without considering the said fact, the trial Court erroneously dismissed the application, the trial Court further failed to consider that the respondent is earning Rs.9,000/- p.m. and he is liable to pay maintenance. Hence, the learned counsel prays to set aside the order of the trial Court and the allow the revision petition.

3. In support of his contentions, the learned counsel for



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top