Heard both sides.

2. The Appellant/Complainant has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment dated 07.08.2015 in STC No.233 of 2014 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, (Fast Track Court) Hosur.

3. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner while passing the Impugned Judgment in STC No.233 of 2014 dated 07.08.2015 at Paragraph No.14 had interalia observed that on perusal of the case cheque it comes to be known that the signature of the Respondent/ Accused was in one colour ink and the Complainant's name and Amount were in different ink and if the cheque was written by the Respondent/Accused in two different colour ink pens and given by him, there was no possibility to do like that and that the complainant had not established that the Respondent had committed an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and ultimately found not guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and convicted him under Section 255(1) of Cr.P.C.,

4. Assailing the validity, legality and correctness of the Judgment of acquittal dated 07.08.2015 in STC No.233 of 2014 passed by the trial court, the Appellant/Complainant, as an aggrie