SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3167

G.CHOCKALINGAM
D. Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Nagamunusamy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shrenik Raj
For the Respondent: Mr. A.V. Radha Krishnan

ORDER :

This Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed by the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai made in Crl. A. No. 79 of 2015, dated 18.03.2016 confirming the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court No. I, Egmore, Chennai made in CC No. 1550 of 2011, dated 26.03.2015.

2. The brief facts leading to filing of the present revision are as follows :-

The revision petitioner/accused approached the complainant for a personal loan to the tune of Rs.4,00,000/- for his business purposes. Considering his request, the complainant granted Rs.4,00,000/- on 11.03.2009. The accused executed demand promissory note for Rs.4,00,000/-, to discharge the above said loan amount, the accused executed a cheque bearing No. 269753 dated 09.01.2011 in favour of the complainant. Ex.P2/Cheque was presented for collection on 20.01.2011, the same was returned with an endorsement "funds insufficient" on 21.01.2011. The complainant issued statutory legal notice on 02.02.2011 through registered post with acknowledgement card, the accused received the said legal notice on 08.02.2011, the accused has not replied to the said notice nor repaid the due amount. Hence,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top