SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3196

M.V.MURALIDARAN
Kuyil Baby Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Mathimugam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. N. Suresh
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Rajasekar

ORDER :

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order made in E.A.No.319 of 2014 in E.A.No.277 of 2010 in E.P. .... of 2010 in O.S.No.261 of 1991, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore, dated 20.08.2014.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the second petitioner, namely, Mr. Narayanan is the original decree holder in O.S.No.261 of 1991, dated 30.06.1993, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore. Originally, the suit in O.S.No.261 of 1991 was filed by the father of the second petitioner, namely, Pramasivam, against one Arumugam, S/o Manickam, Subramaniam, Ganesan, Ramalingam, Sons of Arumugam seeking the approval from the defendants and claiming the amount. The said suit was dismissed. Later on, an appeal in A.S.No.204 of 1993 was filed by the father of the second petitioner, namely, Mr. Paramasivam, before the I Additional Subordinate Court, Cuddalore and the same was decreed in favour of the said Paramasivam.

3. After the decree, the second petitioner has made over the decree passed in A.S.No.204 of 1993, in favour of this respondent, namely, Mathimugam. Thereafter, the respondent Mathimugam has filed E.P. ... of 2010 along with E.A.


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top