SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3328

M.V.MURALIDARAN
V. Rajamani – Appellant
Versus
Danabalan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.Valliappan
For the Respondent: Mr. S.Kumaresan

ORDER :

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the Fair and decreetal order of the II Additional District Munsif Court at Erode, dated 10.10.2013 in I.A.No.390 of 2013 in O.S.No.641 of 2008.

2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.641 of 2008 on the file of the 2nd Additional District Munsif Court, Erode.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner / plaintiff has filed the above suit for specific performance on the ground that this respondent / defendant has agreed to sell the suit properties for a sum of Rs.20,000/- and on the sale agreement was executed on 08.09.2002 in respect of the suit properties for a sum of Rs.20,000/-. On the same day, the respondent/plaintiff has paid a sum of Rs.15,000/- to the respondent / defendant as per the sale agreement dated 08.09.2002. The respondent/defendant should execute the sale deed in respect of the suit properties on or before 08.09.2008, on receipt of the balance sale consideration. But on the failure of execution of sale deed by the defendant, the revision petitioner/plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance in O.S.No.641 of 2008 before the above said Court.

4. The case of the respondent/defen




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top