The appellants are the defendants in a suit for declaration and for permanent injunction. The respondent herein filed the suit by claiming that he purchased the suit property from one Saradammal in the year 2003 under Ex.A1 sale deed.

2. According to the plaintiff, the defendants have no right or title over the suit property. On the other hand, the suit was contested by the defendants. Their specific case is that the vendor of the plaintiff viz., Saradammal, who said to have got the title to the suit property by way of a settlement deed, has conveyed the property in favour of the plaintiff under Ex.A1 specifically giving the boundaries to the property conveyed, even though the settlement deed under which she got title did not specify any boundaries. In other words, it is the contention of the defendants that the vendor of the plaintiff is not entitled to convey a property with specific boundaries, when she herself did not get such right under the said settlement deed.

3. The plaintiff while filing the present suit has described the suit property in the plaint schedule without stating any specific boundaries, however only by stating the survey number and the extent.

4. The tr