S.MANIKUMAR, D.KRISHNA KUMAR
Falcon Types Ltd. , Rep. , by its Authorised Signatory, Shri Chander Kothari – Appellant
Versus
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal – Respondent
Mr. S. Manikumar, J.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the Final Order No. 40100 of 2016, dated 25.01.2016, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), South Zonal Bench, Chennai 600 006, declining to entertain the appeal, as time barred.
2. Short facts leading to the appeal are that the appellant submitted a Bill of Entry on 26.08.2006, for import of natural rubber and the goods were assessed. Part of goods were cleared duty-free and part of goods were cleared on payment of appropriate customs duty on 13.09.2006. Appellant has contended that the order of assessment, dated 26.08.2006, was erroneous, on the grounds that the imported goods are classifiable under CTH 4001 22 00 under CN 21/2002 Sl. No. 491, which attracts duty at the rate of 20% + Nil + 2% + 4%, and at the time of assessment, the goods were classified under CTH 400110.10, which attracts higher duty and at the time of assessment, the same was not noticed by them. The appellant has contended that when they opted for reassessment of bill of entry, the same was not
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise v. Hongo India (P) Ltd.
Indian Coffee Worker’s Co-op. Society Ltd., v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
M.P. Steel Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise
Mohd. Ashfaq v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P.
Mukri Gopalan v. Cheppilat Puthuapurayil Aboobacker
Singh Enterprises v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.