SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3684

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.S.RAVI
Veerapathiran – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Inspector of Police Avaniapuram Police Station Madurai District – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Gopalakrishna Lakshmana Raju, Senior Counsel for T. Vadivelan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: C. Ramesh, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

The appellants are the accused 1 to 3 in S.C.No.45 of 2009 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, No.II, Madurai. The respondent filed final report against a total number of six accused including the appellants. The other two, by name, Thannasi and Eswaran were found to be juveniles in conflict with law and the case against them has been dealt with by the Juvenile Justice Board. Yet another accused Boomi @ Boominathan died during trial. Thus, these appellants/A1 to A3 were alone faced trial before the trial Court. The trial Court framed as many as five charges as detailed below:

Charges

Accused

Penal Provisions

1

A1 to A3

148 IPC

2

A1 to A3

341 IPC

3

A1 to A3

302 IPC

4

A2

326 IPC (2 counts)

5

A3

326 IPC

2. By judgment dated 24.03.2010, finally, the trial Court convicted the appellants as follows:

      

Accused

Conviction under Section

Sentence imposed

A1

148, 341 and 302 IPC

To undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence under S

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top