SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3529

M.JAICHANDREN, S.NAGAMUTHU
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
State, rep. by The Inspector of Police, Veeranam Police Station, Salem – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :M/s. Swaminathan, Law Associates, Mr. R. Karthikeyan, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Maharaja, Addl.P.P. in both the appeals

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

The appellants are the accused 1 to 6, in Sessions Case No.155 of 2002, on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem. The trial Court framed charges against the accused as detailed below:

Sl.No.

Charges (Section of law)

Accused

1.

U/s.148 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Properties (Damages and Loss) Act 1992

A1

2.

U/s.148, 324 and 302 r/w.149 of the Indian Penal Code

A2

3.

U/s.148 and 302 r/w.149 of the Indian Penal Code

A3 to A6

By JUDGMENT dated 14.08.2013, the trial Court convicted all the six accused under these charges and sentenced them as follows:

Sl.No.

Rank of accused

Conviction

Sentence

1.

A1 to A6

U/s.148 of the Indian Penal Code

Rigorous imprisonment for two years each.

 

A2

U/s.324 of the Indian Penal Code

Rigorous imprisonment for one year.

 

A1

U/s.302 of the Indian Penal Code

Life Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.7,00


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top